Gasb 62 Asc 980 Regulatory Accounting Advantages | UtilityEducation.com
Regulatory Accounting

Gasb 62 Asc 980 Regulatory Accounting Advantages

Russ Hissom, CPA Russ Hissom, CPA
October 15, 2023
4 min read

ASC 980 and GASB 62 Are Your Friend

ASC 980 and GASB 62? That may sound like something dull and/or imposed on an organization — something you would not do unless you had to. Not so! ASC 980 and GASB 62 are your friend when it comes to events that cannot be recovered in customer rates in the current period.

Events like unexpected major storms, increases in power costs, contributed assets, long-term pension obligations, and commodity mark-to-market gains or losses can all impact current cash flows — but may not be collectible from customers until a future rate change. The standards for using regulatory accounting — FASB ASC 980 (for IOUs and cooperatives), GASB 62 (for municipal utilities, joint action agencies, and CCAs), and FERC Account 182.3 — allow deferring these events and adding them to customer rates when approved by your oversight body.

The bottom line: Regulatory accounting under ASC 980 or GASB 62 matches the timing of rate recovery from customers with the underlying expense or revenue event — giving utilities powerful tools to manage financial results and protect ratepayers from sharp rate swings.

5 Reasons to Use Regulatory Accounting

Reason 1

"We are in the middle of a budget year — we can't raise rates."

Regulatory accounting is the tool to use to avoid damage to this year's income statement. Take a major storm as an example: those costs should be expensed, but deferring them for future rate recovery provides options instead of suffering through a year of financial statement losses or failing to meet bond coverage requirements.

Reason 2

"Our budget for next year is full — but we might be able to raise rates the year after."

Regulatory accounting is perfect for deferring costs for recovery in future rates. Putting costs "on the bench" until next year is a great tool — but the correct application requires a "date certain" for future rate recovery. The plan must be "we will include these storm damage costs in customer rates the year after next," not just "someday." ASC 980 and GASB 62 are also good tools to use to defer expenses and hold off rate increases in high interest rate and inflationary environments.

Reason 3

Your organization has impaired assets with outstanding revenue bonds.

Those revenue bonds still need to be paid even if the asset has been written down. Should ratepayers pay those bonds? Absolutely — electric customers share in the risk of the business. When things go well, they get the benefits; when they don't, customers share in the risk through their rates. Using regulatory accounting allows deferral of the impairment loss and recognition over the rate recovery period, matching debt payments.

Reason 4

"Our long-term pension obligation is increasing 8% per year, but we can only pass 4% through in rates."

Regulatory accounting allows deferral of the 4% differential, recognizing it when collected in electric customer rates. This prevents a sudden pension obligation from overwhelming current-year financials and forcing a rate spike.

Reason 5

"It is hard to convince our oversight Board to increase rates."

In the short term, costs can be deferred on the financial statements — but a date must be set for rate recovery. This is a temporary fix to budget and rate issues, not a permanent solution. That said, it buys time for management to build the case for a rate change and for the Board to get comfortable with the need.

The Foundation of Utility Financial Reporting and Ratemaking

Regulatory accounting under ASC 980 or GASB 62 matches the timing of rate recovery from customers with the underlying expense or revenue event. Unexpected weather events, impaired assets, capital contributions, long-term obligations, commodity pricing swings — almost any event that fits this description can benefit from deferring the impact over the rate recovery period.

The use of these standards is at the essence of power and utilities accounting. Their application should be an integral part of evaluating financial performance and should be a key part of the budget process for any utility or cooperative.

Related Course
Mastering Regulatory Assets
3.5 NASBA CPE hours  ·  On-demand access
View Course →
Stay Current
New articles and course updates — straight to your inbox
You’re subscribed — thank you!

Go Deeper
Mastering Regulatory Assets
On-demand training designed for utility and cooperative finance professionals.
3.5 NASBA CPE hours  ·  On-demand access
View Course →
Free Newsletter
Utility accounting insights in your inbox

Practical guidance for utility and cooperative finance professionals — new articles, course updates, and industry insights. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

You’re subscribed — thank you!
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Russ Hissom, CPA
Written by
Russ Hissom, CPA
Principal, UtilityEducation.com  ·  35+ Years of Utility Accounting Experience

Russ Hissom is a nationally recognized utility accounting and rate expert with deep hands-on experience in FERC and RUS accounting, regulatory accounting, cost-of-service studies, and rate design for electric utilities and cooperatives across the United States. He also serves as an expert witness before FERC, state commissions, and in arbitration proceedings. Learn about consulting services →

Disclaimer: The material in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal or accounting advice provided by Utility Accounting & Rates Specialists, LLC. You should seek formal advice on this topic from your accounting or legal advisor.